Browser font fallback determines the threat. When a page specifies font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif and a string contains Cyrillic а, the browser checks Arial’s glyph tables, finds Cyrillic coverage, and renders it using Arial’s Cyrillic glyphs — which are pixel-identical to the Latin ones. The CSS font stack you ship determines which column of the danger rate table applies to your users. Arial at 40.8% is a different risk profile from Didot at 19.2%.
Любовь Ширижик (Старший редактор отдела «Силовые структуры»)
，推荐阅读服务器推荐获取更多信息
12 February 2026ShareSave
规模效应之下，头部集团的资源吸附与会员掠夺能力持续强化，而尚处消费生态构建阶段的腰部集团则承压日增。此消彼长之间，行业“方差”还将持续扩大，马太效应愈发凸显。